So Al Gore won the Nobel Peace Prize for his environmental activism. Good for him. Although ever since they gave a Nobel Peace Prize to Yasser Arafat, the award has been sort of a joke. In Gore’s case, the award comes on the heels of a British Judge declaring that An Inconvenient Truth should not be shown in schools without a disclaimer describing several serious problems with the arguments presented in the film.
I respect that lots of people are concerned about the environment in general and global warming specifically. That’s great, we all have our own set of things that we care about. The one thing that bothers me is that any time someone presents opposing arguments or questions their facts, the Gore fans seem to come back with some variation of: “Well, even if our facts are off and our premise is faulty, these policies are just the right thing to do .”
I dunno, I think it’s important to have the basics laid out first. I mean, just look at the Iraq war. We went in there for WMD and didn’t find any. Not even a single nuke strapped to a camel or anything. So how about the Iraq war proponents come out and say “Okay, our premise was wrong, our facts didn’t pan out, but it’s still cool beans because taking out a cruel dictator is just the right thing to do.” Would you buy that?
That’s the way the hardcore environmentalists seem to make their arguments, “It doesn’t matter if our facts are off because our intentions are so good, so we should just roll with it.”
Here’s some respected science dude (that’s not his official title
) who’s concerned about the way global warming is being presented…
ONE of the world’s foremost meteorologists has called the theory that helped Al Gore share the Nobel Peace Prize “ridiculous” and the product of “people who don’t understand how the atmosphere works”.
Dr William Gray, a pioneer in the science of seasonal hurricane forecasts, told a packed lecture hall at the University of North Carolina that humans were not responsible for the warming of the earth.
His comments came on the same day that the Nobel committee honoured Mr Gore for his work in support of the link between humans and global warming.
“We’re brainwashing our children,” said Dr Gray, 78, a long-time professor at Colorado State University. “They’re going to the Gore movie [An Inconvenient Truth] and being fed all this. It’s ridiculous.”
At his first appearance since the award was announced in Oslo, Mr Gore said: “We have to quickly find a way to change the world’s consciousness about exactly what we’re facing.”
Mr Gore shared the Nobel prize with the United Nations climate panel for their work in helping to galvanise international action against global warming.
But Dr Gray, whose annual forecasts of the number of tropical storms and hurricanes are widely publicised, said a natural cycle of ocean water temperatures - related to the amount of salt in ocean water - was responsible for the global warming that he acknowledges has taken place.
However, he said, that same cycle meant a period of cooling would begin soon and last for several years.
“We’ll look back on all of this in 10 or 15 years and realise how foolish it was,” Dr Gray said.
During his speech to a crowd of about 300 that included meteorology students and a host of professional meteorologists, Dr Gray also said those who had linked global warming to the increased number of hurricanes in recent years were in error.
He cited statistics showing there were 101 hurricanes from 1900 to 1949, in a period of cooler global temperatures, compared to 83 from 1957 to 2006 when the earth warmed.
“The human impact on the atmosphere is simply too small to have a major effect on global temperatures,” Dr Gray said.
He said his beliefs had made him an outsider in popular science.
“It bothers me that my fellow scientists are not speaking out against something they know is wrong,” he said. “But they also know that they’d never get any grants if they spoke out. I don’t care about grants.”
Now, again, I totally respect that some people care a lot about the environment. I have several friends who are very green-minded and I think it’s great for them to pursue something that interests them. I definitely don’t mean to belittle the things in which they believe, just like I don’t appreciate when people belittle the things that I believe, whether it’s something central to me, like religion, or something trivial like which movies I enjoy or what bands I’m into. Nobody likes being told they’re foolish, so I definitely aim for respectful discourse.